Those who are against the law-abiding citizen's right to keep an

Villas - Those who are against the law-abiding citizen's right to keep and bear arms, per our U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment, need to ask themselves what "shall not be infringed" means to them? Does it mean "reasonable" or "sensible" restrictions or prohibitions? Those who created the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were only too aware of the tendency of power to corrupt and corrupt absolutely. Which right would they be willing to give up or have "tweaked" so as not to offend anyone?