Moderator Re. That does not give him the right to interfere. Please explain how asking them to take a closer look at the play the U.S. soccer player was red carded for is interference? By your logic NBA Referees taking a look at their snap decision on the court via video tape that is then overturned is interference. Perhaps you’d be better served just moderating as you clearly don’t understand a spur of the moment incorrect call overturned after further review. Why do you think video review was instituted in the first place? Admit your mistake in print? Or will you bury it?
Moderator's Note: Our president is not part of the reviewing process and he has no business asking. Would they have given an ordinary fan that position? That is an opinion,not a fact. The red card decision was wrong and that too is an opinion. Differences of opinion are great fun in the sporting world.