To the commentor who responded: “Your point? That people had valid concerns with the limited supplies available in an area that is a dead end when it comes to getting said supplies?” My “point” was that you insisted the “ONLY TIME” you had seen vitriol was regarding “when a second homeowner either wants to vote in more than one place or acts as if residents would cease to exist without them.” I demonstrated a legitimate, and recent, third example that persists to this day. Why is that a problem? Second, what’s “valid” about "closing bridges", and vigilante “license plate” monitoring?