If society accepts the premise that biological sex can be changed, it necessarily raises a legitimate question about why other immutable characteristics—such as race—are treated as categorically unchangeable. While the two are not identical, the comparison is logically relevant because the underlying reasoning used to justify one cannot be cleanly excluded from the other. Dismissing the comparison outright avoids the core issue rather than addressing it. If boundaries are not clearly defined, the question becomes unavoidable: where does it stop?