I know the county's farmland preservation program allows buildings to be constructed on preserved land if the owner intends to use the property as a winery, but that's the problem! The taxpayers got nothing for their money. The West Cape Winery may have had a home on it already but the two other large buildings were just recently constructed. You can't say the land is "preserved" if anyone can just declare themselves a winery and build whatever they want. The West Cape May Winery certainly should not have been allowed to build so far back off the road.
Moderator's Note: Is the spouter contending that they did not follow the regulations?