Once again, the Avalon anti-gun spouter reaches for the absurd. After citing hypothetical scenarios, he imagines one in which the incident does not happen because the deranged killer does not have a gun. Obviously he associates the type or armament with the urge to kill, which is fallacious. He must not know about mass killings committed by knives, swords or axes. He must not realize that anyone can whip up a quick, improvised explosive devise with information available online. It is ridiculous. What would Jesus do? I don't know, but several well-armed Crusades were fought in Jesus' name.