Only a Philly jury would award $2.25 billion (that's a B) to a man who routinely spread herbicide Roundup in 25-30 gallon loads on his 2-acre property. This despite US and European agencies finding no evidence that it causes cancer. (Only WHO suggested it "may".) Is it a desire by people who couldn't escape jury duty to briefly live vicariously through the person they award a ridiculous fortune to? The law firm gets a huge commission so they can continue victimizing society on behalf of themselves and a few lucky winners.